ANTHROPICINVESTMENT

INDEPENDENT · NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANTHROPIC PBC · NO ADVICE · NO MONETISATION · DYOR

Bear case

The case against Anthropic's valuation

Stated as strongly as the evidence allows, and no more. The bull case is built from the same figures and gets the same number of arguments.

Argument 01

A $2T listing requires revenue that no software company has ever reached

Chan Ahn of Tessera PE argues that $2T implies roughly $725B of revenue by 2036 at a 10 percent cost of capital, which is far beyond any precedent.

Discussed IPO valuation
$2T

Discussed in press reports. Never confirmed by the company.

VERIFIED 2026-08-27bloomberg.com

Argument 02

Customers are moving to cheaper models that are good enough

The FT has reported buyers increasingly picking lower-cost models, which breaks the assumption that model progress converts into higher customer spend.

Forecast revenue, 2028
$190–200B

Third-party forecast, not company guidance.

VERIFIED 2026-08-27reuters.com

Argument 03

The closest recent comparable has returned nothing to its IPO buyers

SpaceX priced at about $1.77T in June 2026 and gave IPO buyers no return over the following two months, while Palantir trades near 53x forward revenue.

SpaceX IPO valuation, June 2026
$1.77T

Closest recent comparable listing.

VERIFIED 2026-08-27reuters.com

3 arguments run the other way and use the same sources.

READ THE BULL CASE →